I never used this and it seems xlrd doesn't even support .xlsx any-
more anyways. If this was needed I could theoretically use openpyxl
but I'd rather just stick to CSV.
When a user explicitly requests that a field be excluded with -x we
skip that field in most checks. Up until now that did not include
the item-based checks using a transposed dataframe because we don't
know the metadata field names (labels) until we iterate over them.
Now the excludes are respected for item-based checks.
We actually want to do this after we try to fix mojibake with ftfy.
These "unnecessary" Unicode characters could actually help ftfy in
some cases because often times they indicate that some character
from another encoding was there before (like an accent, dash, or
smart quote).
This checks if the item title exists in the citation. If it is not
present it could just be missing, or could have minor differences
in the whitespace, accents, etc.
If unsafe fixes (-u) are enabled then we don't need to do the check
first before actually fixing them. Doing the check first creates e-
tra output that needs to be reviewed by the user.
This detects whether text has likely been encoded in one encoding
and decoded in another, perhaps multiple times. This often results
in display of "mojibake" characters.
For example, a file encoded in UTF-8 is opened as CP-1252 (Windows
Latin codepage) in Microsoft Excel, and saved again as UTF-8. You
will see strings like this in the resulting file:
- CIAT Publicaçao
- CIAT Publicación
The correct version of these in UTF-8 would be:
- CIAT Publicaçao
- CIAT Publicación
I use a code snippet from Martijn Pieters on StackOverflow to de-
tect whether a string is "weird" as determined by the excellent
"fixes text for you" (ftfy) Python library, then check if a weird
string encodes as CP-1252 or not. If so, I can try to fix it.
See: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29071995/identify-garbage-unicode-string-using-python
By using df[column] = df[column].apply(check...) we were re-writing
the DataFrame every time we returned from a check. We don't actuall
y need to return a value at all, as the point of checks is to print
a warning to the screen. In Python a "return" statement without a v
ariable returns None.
I haven't measured the impact of this, but I assume it will mean we
are faster and use less memory.
This is no longer class-ified as "unsafe" as I have yet to see a
case where this was intentional, and it always causes issues when
you import the data in a DSpace repository.
We used to only check fields that had "date" in their name because
we were using DSpace's default dc.date.* fields. Now we are using
dcterms.issued so I will add that one as well.
I just came across some metadata that had unnecessary multi-value
separators at the end of a field, causing a blank value to be used.
For example: "Kenya||Tanzania||"
Works decenty well assuming the title, abstract, and citation fields
are an accurate representation of the language as identified by the
language field. Handles ISO 639-1 (alpha 2) and ISO 639-3 (alpha 3)
values seamlessly.
This includes updated pipenv environment, test data, pytest tests
for both correct and incorrect ISO 639-1 and ISO 639-3 languages,
and a new command line option "-e".
This happens in names very often, for example in the contributor
and citation fields. I will limit this to those fields for now and
hide this fix behind the "unsafe fixes" option until I test it more.
This makes it easier to understand where the error is in case a CSV
has multiple date fields, for example:
Missing date (dc.date.issued).
Missing date (dc.date.issued[]).
If you have 126 items and you get 126 "Missing date" messages then
it's likely that 100 of the items have dates in one field, and the
others have dates in other field.
Generally we want people to upload documents in accessible formats
like PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. This check warns if a file
is using an uncommon extension.
Now it will print just the part of the metadata value that contains
the suspicious character (up to 80 characters, so we don't make the
line break on terminals that use 80 character width by default).
Also, print the name of the field in which the metadata value is so
that it is easier for the user to locate.
AGROVOC validation is now disabled by default, but can be enabled
on a field-by-field basis. For example, countries and regions are
also present in AGROVOC. Fields with these values can be enabled
using the new `--agrovoc-fields` option.
I reworked the script output to show the field name when printing
an invalid term so that the user knows in which field the term is.
This was tricky because of the nature of newlines. In actuality we
are removing Unix line feeds here (U+000A) because Windows carriage
returns are actually already removed by the string stripping in the
whitespace fix.
Creating the test case in Vim was difficult because I couldn't fig-
ure out how to manually enter a line feed character. In the end I
used a search and replace on a known pattern like "ALAN", replacing
it with \r. Neither entering the Unicode code point (U+000A) direc-
tly or typing an "Enter" character after ^V worked. Grrr.
Will validate against ISO 639-2 or ISO 639-3 depending on how long
the language field is. Otherwise will return that the language is
invalid.
Does not currently have any support for generic values like "Other".
These standalone characters often indicate issues with encoding or
copy/paste in languages with accents like French and Spanish. For
example: foreˆt should be forêt.
It is not possible to fix these issues automatically, but this will
print a warning so you can notify the owner of the data.
These are things like non-breaking spaces, "replacement" characters,
etc that add nothing to the metadata and often cause errors during
parsing or displaying in a UI.
In this case it fixes occurences of invalid multi-value separators.
DSpace uses "||" to separate multiple values in one field, but our
editors sometimes give us files with mistakes like "|". We can fix
these to be correct multi-value separators if we are sure that the
metadata is not actually using "|" for some legitimate purpose.