iseal-core/site/content/terms/resource-description-code-clause-number/resource-description-code-clause-number.txt
Alan Orth 286896486e
Add initial version of schema specification site
After running the util/generate_docs.py script to parse and extract
the metadata term specifications and their controlled vocabularies,
we use Hugo to generate the HTML site. The HTML site uses Bootstrap
with several ISEAL brand colors gleaned from the corporate website.
2021-11-01 08:27:41 +02:00

109 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext

A-4.1.1-Accountability
A-4.2.1-Risk management plan
A-4.2.2-Liability and Financing
A-4.3.1-Assurance model
A-4.4.1-Data sources
A-4.4.2-Information management system
A-4.4.3-Data integrity
A-4.4.4-Data governance
A-4.5.1-Management reviews
A-4.5.2-Improvement feedback loop
A-4-Efficiency and Improvement
A-5.1.10-Remediation and consequences
A-5.1.11-Integrity of assurance status
A-5.1.12-Complaints procedure
A-5.1.13-Misrepresentation and corruption
A-5.1.14-Records and document control
A-5.1.1-Documented management system
A-5.1.2-Assessment methodology
A-5.1.3-Sampling within the assessment
A-5.1.4-Use of technical experts
A-5.1.5-Exceptions
A-5.1.6-Group assessment
A-5.1.7-Group non-conformities
A-5.1.8-Decision-making mechanism
A-5.1.9-Appeals
A-5.2.1-Legality
A-5.2.2-Legal contracts
A-5.2.3-Internal audits
A-5.2.4-Responsibility for outsourcing
A-5.2.5-Authority for assurance decisions
A-5.3.1-Equivalence arrangements
A-5.4.1-Oversight mechanism
A-5.4.2-Independence of oversight
A-5.4.3-Competence of oversight personnel
A-5.4.4-Authority of oversight bodies
A-5.4.5-Accreditation
A-5.4.6-Proxy accreditation
A-5.5.1-Personnel competencies
A-5.5.2-Building competence
A-5.5.3-Auditor calibration
A-5.5.4-Evaluation of competency
A-5.6.1-Impartiality and Conflicts of interest
A-5.6.2-Auditor impartiality
A-5.6.3-Impartiality in the assessment
A-5.6.4-Impartial decision-making
A-5-Rigour and Impartiality
A-6.1.1-Information on performance
A-6.2.1-Accessibility
A-6.2.2-Risk-based assessment
A-6.3.1-Publicly available information
A-6.3.2-Stakeholder input
I-8.3-Performance Monitoring
I-8.4-Quality Assurance for Performance Monitoring
I-8.5-Outcome and Impact Evaluations
I-8.6-Quality Assurance for Outcome and Impact Evaluations
I-8.7-Monitoring and Evaluation Reports
I-8.8-Indicator Alignment
I-8.9-Communication of Evaluation Results
I-9. Learning and Improving-
I-9.1-Internalising Learning and Improving
I-9.2-Improving M&E System Effectiveness
I-9.3-Responding to and Using M&E Results
I--Aspirational Good Practice
SS-4.1-Standard-Setting Procedures
SS-4.2-Consistency Between Standards
SS-5.10-Records
SS-5.11-Resolving Complaints
SS-5.1-Terms of Reference
SS-5.2-Stakeholder Identification
SS-5.3-Public Summary
SS-5.4-Public Consultation
SS-5.5-Feasibility Assessment
SS-5.6-Decision-Making
SS-5.7-Standards' Availability
SS-5.8-Review and Revision of Standards
SS-5.9-Transition Period
SS-6.1-Sustainability Outcomes
SS-6.2-Performance Level
SS-6.3-Consistent Interpretation
SS-6.4-Local ApplicabilityA-6.3.3-Changes to the assurance system
A-6-Value and Accessbility
I-10. Transparency and Public Information-
I-10.1-Publicly Available Information About the M&E System
I-10.2-Transparency of Evaluations
I-10.3-Substantiating Claims
I-10.4-Increased Transparency, Public Access, and Engagement
I-5.1-Monitoring and Evaluation System
I-5.2-Scope and Boundaries of the M&E System
I-5.3-Plan for Expansion
I-5.4-Resources
I-5.5-Roles and Responsibilities
I-5.6-Data Management
I-5.7-Data Confidentiality and Use
I-5.8-Integrating M&E in the Organisation
I-5.9-Cooperation and Coordination
I-6. Stakeholder Engagement in M&E System Design-
I-6.1-Stakeholder Identification
I-6.2-Stakeholder Consultation
I-7. Defining the Intended Change
I-7.1-Intended Impact and Outcomes
I-7.2-Causal Pathways
I-7.3-Unintended Effects
I-7.4-Influencing Factors
I-8. Monitoring and Evaluation-
I-8.11-Ethical Guidelines
I-8.1-Benefits of M&E for Entities Involved in the Standard System
I-8.1-Performance Monitoring and Outcome and Impact Evaluation
I-8.2-Indicators