Documenting day-to-day work on the CGSpace repository.
dc.rights
to the input form, including some inline instructions/hints:Testing the CMYK patch on a collection with 650 items:
$ [dspace]/bin/dspace filter-media -f -i 10568/16498 -p "ImageMagick PDF Thumbnail" -v >& /tmp/filter-media-cmyk.txt
filter-media
bug that causes it to process JPGs even when limiting to the PDF thumbnail plugin: DS-3516filter-media
plugin creates JPG thumbnails with the CMYK colorspace when the source PDF is using CMYKInterestingly, it seems DSpace 4.x’s thumbnails were sRGB, but forcing regeneration using DSpace 5.x’s ImageMagick plugin creates CMYK JPGs if the source PDF was CMYK (see 10568⁄51999):
$ identify ~/Desktop/alc_contrastes_desafios.jpg
/Users/aorth/Desktop/alc_contrastes_desafios.jpg JPEG 464x600 464x600+0+0 8-bit CMYK 168KB 0.000u 0:00.000
An item was mapped twice erroneously again, so I had to remove one of the mappings manually:
dspace=# select * from collection2item where item_id = '80278';
id | collection_id | item_id
-------+---------------+---------
92551 | 313 | 80278
92550 | 313 | 80278
90774 | 1051 | 80278
(3 rows)
dspace=# delete from collection2item where id = 92551 and item_id = 80278;
DELETE 1
Create issue on GitHub to track the addition of CCAFS Phase II project tags (#301)
Looks like we’ll be using cg.identifier.ccafsprojectpii
as the field name
While looking in the logs for errors, I see tons of warnings about Atmire MQM:
2016-12-02 03:00:32,352 WARN com.atmire.metadataquality.batchedit.BatchEditConsumer @ BatchEditConsumer should not have been given this kind of Subject in an event, skipping: org.dspace.event.Event(eventType=CREATE, SubjectType=BUNDLE, SubjectID=70316, ObjectType=(Unknown), ObjectID=-1, TimeStamp=1480647632305, dispatcher=1544803905, detail=[null], transactionID="TX157907838689377964651674089851855413607")
2016-12-02 03:00:32,353 WARN com.atmire.metadataquality.batchedit.BatchEditConsumer @ BatchEditConsumer should not have been given this kind of Subject in an event, skipping: org.dspace.event.Event(eventType=MODIFY_METADATA, SubjectType=BUNDLE, SubjectID =70316, ObjectType=(Unknown), ObjectID=-1, TimeStamp=1480647632309, dispatcher=1544803905, detail="dc.title", transactionID="TX157907838689377964651674089851855413607")
2016-12-02 03:00:32,353 WARN com.atmire.metadataquality.batchedit.BatchEditConsumer @ BatchEditConsumer should not have been given this kind of Subject in an event, skipping: org.dspace.event.Event(eventType=ADD, SubjectType=ITEM, SubjectID=80044, Object Type=BUNDLE, ObjectID=70316, TimeStamp=1480647632311, dispatcher=1544803905, detail="THUMBNAIL", transactionID="TX157907838689377964651674089851855413607")
2016-12-02 03:00:32,353 WARN com.atmire.metadataquality.batchedit.BatchEditConsumer @ BatchEditConsumer should not have been given this kind of Subject in an event, skipping: org.dspace.event.Event(eventType=ADD, SubjectType=BUNDLE, SubjectID=70316, Obje ctType=BITSTREAM, ObjectID=86715, TimeStamp=1480647632318, dispatcher=1544803905, detail="-1", transactionID="TX157907838689377964651674089851855413607")
2016-12-02 03:00:32,353 WARN com.atmire.metadataquality.batchedit.BatchEditConsumer @ BatchEditConsumer should not have been given this kind of Subject in an event, skipping: org.dspace.event.Event(eventType=MODIFY, SubjectType=ITEM, SubjectID=80044, ObjectType=(Unknown), ObjectID=-1, TimeStamp=1480647632351, dispatcher=1544803905, detail=[null], transactionID="TX157907838689377964651674089851855413607")
I see thousands of them in the logs for the last few months, so it’s not related to the DSpace 5.5 upgrade
I’ve raised a ticket with Atmire to ask
Another worrying error from dspace.log is:
dc.type
to the output options for Atmire’s Listings and Reports module (#286)I exported a random item’s metadata as CSV, deleted all columns except id and collection, and made a new coloum called ORCID:dc.contributor.author
with the following random ORCIDs from the ORCID registry:
0000-0002-6115-0956||0000-0002-3812-8793||0000-0001-7462-405X
DC=ILRI
to determine whether a user was ILRI or notIt looks like we might be able to use OUs now, instead of DCs:
$ ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://svcgroot2.cgiarad.org:3269/ -b "dc=cgiarad,dc=org" -D "admigration1@cgiarad.org" -W "(sAMAccountName=admigration1)"