May, 2024
2024-05-01
- I dumped all the CGSpace DOIs and resolved them with my
crossref_doi_lookup.py
script- Then I did some work to add missing abstracts (about 900!), volumes, issues, licenses, publishers, and types, etc
2024-05-05
- Spend some time looking at duplicate DOIs again…
2024-05-06
- Spend some time looking at duplicate DOIs again…
2024-05-07
- Discuss RSS feeds and OpenSearch with IWMI
- It seems our OpenSearch feed settings are using the defaults, so I need to copy some of those over from our old DSpace 6 branch
- I saw a patch for an interesting issue on DSpace GitHub: Error submitting or deleting items - URI too long when user is in a large number of groups
- I hadn’t realized it, but we have lots of those errors:
$ zstdgrep -a 'URI Too Long' log/dspace.log-2024-04-* | wc -l
1423
- Spend some time looking at duplicate DOIs again…
2024-05-08
- Spend some time looking at duplicate DOIs again…
- I finally finished looking at the duplicate DOIs for journal articles
- I updated the list of handle redirects and there are 386 of them!
2024-05-09
- Spend some time working on the IFPRI 2020–2021 batch
- I started by checking for exact duplicates (1.0 similarity) using DOI, type, and issue date
2024-05-12
- I couldn’t figure out how to do a complex join on withdrawn items along with their metadata, so I pull out a few like titles, handles, and provenance separately:
dspace=# \COPY (SELECT i.uuid, m.text_value AS uri FROM item i JOIN metadatavalue m ON i.uuid = m.dspace_object_id WHERE withdrawn AND m.metadata_field_id=25) TO /tmp/withdrawn-handles.csv CSV HEADER;
dspace=# \COPY (SELECT i.uuid, m.text_value AS title FROM item i JOIN metadatavalue m ON i.uuid = m.dspace_object_id WHERE withdrawn AND m.metadata_field_id=64) TO /tmp/withdrawn-titles.csv CSV HEADER;
dspace=# \COPY (SELECT i.uuid, m.text_value AS submitted_by FROM item i JOIN metadatavalue m ON i.uuid = m.dspace_object_id WHERE withdrawn AND m.metadata_field_id=28 AND m.text_value LIKE 'Submitted by%') TO /tmp/withdrawn-submitted-by.csv CSV HEADER;
- Then joined them:
$ csvjoin -c uuid /tmp/withdrawn-title.csv /tmp/withdrawn-handles.csv /tmp/withdrawn-submitted-by.csv > /tmp/withdrawn.csv
- This gives me an insight into who submitted at 334 of the duplicates over the past few years…
- I fixed a few hundred titles with leading/trailing whitespace, newlines, and ligatures like ff, fi, fl, ffi, and ffl
2024-05-13
- Export a list of IFPRI information products with handle links and CONTENTdm links:
$ csvgrep -c 'dc.description.provenance[en_US]' -m 'CONTENTdm' cgspace.csv \
| csvcut -c 'id,dc.description.provenance[en_US],dc.identifier.uri[en_US]' \
| tee /tmp/ifpri-redirects.csv \
| csvstat --count
2645
- I discovered the
/server/api/pid/find
endpoint today, which is much more direct and manageable than the/server/api/discover/search/objects?query=
endpoint when trying to get metadata for a Handle (item, collection, or community)- The “pid” stands for permanent identifiers apparently, and we can use it like this:
https://dspace7test.ilri.org/server/api/pid/find?id=10568/118424
2024-05-15
- I got journal titles for 2,900 journal articles that were missing them from Crossref
2024-05-16
Helping IFPRI with some DSpace 7 API support, these are two queries for items issued in 2024:
- https://dspace7test.ilri.org/server/api/discover/search/objects?query=dcterms.issued:2024
- https://dspace7test.ilri.org/server/api/discover/search/objects?query=dcterms.issued_dt%3A%5B2024-01-01T00%3A00%3A00Z%20TO%20%2A%5D — note the Lucene search syntax is URL encoded version of
:[2024-01-01T00:00:00Z TO *]
Both of them return the same number of results and seem identitical as far as I can see, but the second one uses Solr date indexes and requires the full Lucene datetime and range syntax
I wrote a new version of the check_duplicates.py
script to help identify duplicates with different types
- Initially I called it
check_duplicates_fast.py
but it’s actually not faster - I need to find a way to deal with duplicates from IFPRI’s repository because there are some mismatched types…
2024-05-20
Continue working through alternative duplicate matching for IFPRI
- Their item types are sometimes different than ours…
- One thing I think I can say for sure is that the default similarity factor in my script is 0.6, and I rarely see legitimate duplicates with such similarity so I might increase this to 0.7 to reduce the number of items I have to check
- Also, the difference in issue dates is currently 365, but I should reduce that a bit, perhaps to 270 days (9 months)