2018-08-01
- DSpace Test had crashed at some point yesterday morning and I see the following in
dmesg
:
[Tue Jul 31 00:00:41 2018] Out of memory: Kill process 1394 (java) score 668 or sacrifice child
[Tue Jul 31 00:00:41 2018] Killed process 1394 (java) total-vm:15601860kB, anon-rss:5355528kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
[Tue Jul 31 00:00:41 2018] oom_reaper: reaped process 1394 (java), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
- Judging from the time of the crash it was probably related to the Discovery indexing that starts at midnight
- From the DSpace log I see that eventually Solr stopped responding, so I guess the
java
process that was OOM killed above was Tomcat’s
- I’m not sure why Tomcat didn’t crash with an OutOfMemoryError…
- Anyways, perhaps I should increase the JVM heap from 5120m to 6144m like we did a few months ago when we tried to run the whole CGSpace Solr core
- The server only has 8GB of RAM so we’ll eventually need to upgrade to a larger one because we’ll start starving the OS, PostgreSQL, and command line batch processes
- I ran all system updates on DSpace Test and rebooted it
- I started looking over the latest round of IITA batch records from Sisay on DSpace Test: IITA July_30
- incorrect authorship types
- dozens of inconsistencies, spelling mistakes, and white space in author affiliations
- minor issues in countries (California is not a country)
- minor issues in IITA subjects, ISBNs, languages, and AGROVOC subjects
2018-08-02
- DSpace Test crashed again and I don’t see the only error I see is this in
dmesg
:
[Thu Aug 2 00:00:12 2018] Out of memory: Kill process 1407 (java) score 787 or sacrifice child
[Thu Aug 2 00:00:12 2018] Killed process 1407 (java) total-vm:18876328kB, anon-rss:6323836kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
- I am still assuming that this is the Tomcat process that is dying, so maybe actually we need to reduce its memory instead of increasing it?
- The risk we run there is that we’ll start getting OutOfMemory errors from Tomcat
- So basically we need a new test server with more RAM very soon…
- Abenet asked about the workflow statistics in the Atmire CUA module again
- Last year Atmire told me that it’s disabled by default but you can enable it with
workflow.stats.enabled = true
in the CUA configuration file
- There was a bug with adding users so they sent a patch, but I didn’t merge it because it was very dirty and I wasn’t sure it actually fixed the problem
- I just tried to enable the stats again on DSpace Test now that we’re on DSpace 5.8 with updated Atmire modules, but every user I search for shows “No data available”
- As a test I submitted a new item and I was able to see it in the workflow statistics “data” tab, but not in the graph
2018-08-15
- Run through Peter’s list of author affiliations from earlier this month
- I did some quick sanity checks and small cleanups in Open Refine, checking for spaces, weird accents, and encoding errors
- Finally I did a test run with the
fix-metadata-value.py
script:
$ ./fix-metadata-values.py -i 2018-08-15-Correct-1083-Affiliations.csv -db dspace -u dspace -p 'fuuu' -f cg.contributor.affiliation -t correct -m 211
$ ./delete-metadata-values.py -i 2018-08-15-Remove-11-Affiliations.csv -db dspace -u dspace -p 'fuuu' -f cg.contributor.affiliation -m 211
2018-08-16
- Generate a list of the top 1,500 authors on CGSpace for Sisay so he can create the controlled vocabulary:
dspace=# \copy (select distinct text_value, count(*) from metadatavalue where metadata_field_id = (select metadata_field_id from metadatafieldregistry where element = 'contributor' and qualifier = 'author') AND resource_type_id = 2 group by text_value order by count desc limit 1500) to /tmp/2018-08-16-top-1500-authors.csv with csv;
- Start working on adding the ORCID metadata to a handful of CIAT authors as requested by Elizabeth earlier this month
- I might need to overhaul the add-orcid-identifiers-csv.py script to be a little more robust about author order and ORCID metadata that might have been altered manually by editors after submission, as this script was written without that consideration