Add notes for 2019-04-11

content/posts/2019-04.md

@@ -576,4 +576,29 @@ cr = Crossref(mailto="me@cgiar.org")
 x = cr.funders(query = "mercator")
 ```
 
+## 2019-04-11
+
+- Continue proofing IITA's last round of batch uploads from [March on DSpace Test](https://dspacetest.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100333) (20193rd.xls)
+  - One misspelled country
+  - Three incorrect regions
+  - Potential duplicates (same DOI, similar title, same authors):
+    - [10568/100580](https://dspacetest.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100580) and [10568/100579](https://dspacetest.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100579)
+    - [10568/100444](https://dspacetest.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100444) and [10568/100423](https://dspacetest.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100423)
+  - Two DOIs with incorrect URL formatting
+  - Two misspelled IITA subjects
+  - Two authors with smart quotes
+  - Lots of issues with sponsors
+  - One misspelled "Peer review"
+  - One invalid ISBN that I fixed by Googling the title
+  - Lots of issues with sponsors (German Aid Agency, Swiss Aid Agency, Italian Aid Agency, Dutch Aid Agency, etc)
+  - I validated all the AGROVOC subjects against our latest list with reconcile-csv
+    - About 720 of the 900 terms were matched, then I checked and fixed or deleted the rest manually
+
+- Answer more questions about DOIs and Altmetric scores from WLE
+- Answer more questions about DOIs and Altmetric scores from IWMI
+  - They can't seem to understand the Altmetric + Twitter flow for associating Handles and DOIs
+  - To make things worse, many of their items DON'T have DOIs, so when Altmetric harvests them of course there is no link!  - Then, a bunch of their items don't have scores because they never tweeted them!
+  - They added a DOI to this old item [10567/97087](https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/97087) this morning and wonder why Altmetric's score hasn't linked with the DOI magically
+  - We should check in a week to see if Altmetric will make the association after one week when they harvest again
+
 <!-- vim: set sw=2 ts=2: -->