diff --git a/content/posts/2023-07.md b/content/posts/2023-07.md
index 64a9370f6..a92e82517 100644
--- a/content/posts/2023-07.md
+++ b/content/posts/2023-07.md
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ categories: ["Notes"]
   - In the past I've found their _licensing_ information to not be very reliable (preferring Crossref), but I think their _open access status_ is more reliable, especially when the provider is listed as being the publisher
   - Even so, sometimes the version can be "acceptedVersion", which is presumably the author's version, as opposed to the "publishedVersion", which means it's available as open access on the publisher's website
   - I did some quality assurance and found ~100 that were marked as Limited Access, but should have been Open Access, and fixed a handful of licenses
-- Delete duplicate metadata as describe in my DSpace issue from last year: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/issues/8253
+- Delete duplicate metadata as described in my DSpace issue from last year: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/issues/8253
 - Start working on some statistics on AGROVOC usage for my presenation next week
   - I used the following SQL query to dump values from all subject fields and lower case them: