Add notes for 2019-11-27

This commit is contained in:
2019-11-27 14:56:00 +02:00
parent f74c7223d6
commit 1f2be05583
3 changed files with 51 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -449,4 +449,20 @@ Buck/2.2; (+https://app.hypefactors.com/media-monitoring/about.html)
- I added GitHub issues for eight of the items so far, tagging them by "bug", "search", "feature", "graphics", "low-priority", etc
- I moved AReS v2 to be available on CGSpace
## 2019-11-27
- Minor updates on the [dspace-statistics-api](https://github.com/ilri/dspace-statistics-api)
- Introduce isort for import sorting
- Introduce black for code formatting according to PEP8
- Fix some minor issues raised by flake8
- Release [version 1.1.1](https://github.com/ilri/dspace-statistics-api/releases/tag/v1.1.1) and deploy to DSpace Test (linode19)
- I realize that I never deployed version 1.1.0 (with falcon 2.0.0) on CGSpace (linode18) so I did that as well
- File a ticket (242418) with Altmetric about DCTERMS migration to see if there is anything we need to be careful about
- Make a pull request against cg-core schema to fix inconsistent references to `cg.embargoDate` ([#13](https://github.com/AgriculturalSemantics/cg-core/pull/13))
- Review the AReS feedback again after Peter made some comments
- I standardized the GitHub issue labels in both OpenRXV and AReS issue trackers, using labels like "P-low" for priority
- I filed another handful of issues in both trackers and added them to the spreadsheet
- I need to ask Marie-Angelique about the `cg.peer-reviewed` field
- We currently use `dc.description.version` with values like "Internal Review" and "Peer Review", and CG Core v2 currently recommends using "True" if the field is peer reviewed
<!-- vim: set sw=2 ts=2: -->